Photo editing Keep GTX1080 or Go Quadro?

i see gtx vs quadro horse has been beat death not looking performance increases. i'm looking opinions on either workflow image quality. 

built mini photo editing computer, hardware used were:

 

*fractal design nano s case

*intel i7-6700k

*32gb ddr4 ram

*m.2 pcie ssd (os system)

*2x500 gb ssds (photo storage)

*nvidia gtx 1080

use system editing photography work, content setup snappy rig. shoot lot of music events , shows , portrait work musicians promotions. looking upgrade 4k 10-bit multi panel setup photoshop cc , lightroom cc dosen't support 10-bit geoforce cards. photo editors feel getting quadro (m2000 or m4000) card 10-bit color beneficial editing photos?

it depends on monitor. 10-bit display eliminate banding, nothing more. high-end monitor banding not practical consideration. cheap monitor, is.

 

other that, photoshop doesn't care video card have, long works. ps demands on gpu modest.

 

if can afford quadro m4000, i'd money better spent on eizo cg or nec spectraview.

 

another thing getting 10 bit work. have entry-level quadro, , worked 2 days before reverted 8 bits , that's it's been since. don't care, really, it's not big deal. need special test gradients tell difference.

More discussions in Photoshop

adobe